In March 2024, the state of New Mexico adopted the Clean Transportation Fuel Program as a measure to decarbonize its transportation sector. New Mexico’s Environmental Improvement Board is required to develop rules and standards for the program which is mandated to take effect by 1st July 2026. With the inputs of an advisory committee, the Board has been directed to set an annually decreasing schedule to bring the carbon intensity of the transport sector down to at least 20% below 2018 carbon intensity levels by 2030 and at least 30% by 2040. The first discussion draft of the rules has been released and opened for comments on 19th December 2024.
In 2022, New Mexico’s vehicles emitted 16.095 MMT (million MT) of CO2e accounting for 29% of the state’s[1] emissions. In 2023, EVs and PHEVs together made up 15,200 LDVs on New Mexican roads. They accounted for ~0.8% of the share of LDVs in the State as seen in the table below. This share is lower than the United States national average share of EVs in the LDV segment. The state’s LDV population is dominated by Gasoline and gasoline substitute compatible vehicles making up ~89% of the share. In 2022, the emissions from New Mexico’s transport sector stand at less than a tenth of that of California. Correspondingly, New Mexico’s consumption of transportation gasoline amounted to less than 10% of that of California’s[2].

Source: cCarbon calculations on AFDC data
The CI compliance schedule for gasoline, diesel and their substitutes, and alternate jet fuel are as listed below. While New Mexico would aim to bring the CI standard down to ~60 gCo2e/MJ, the Californian standard (in the absence of AAMs triggered) would be ~24 g CO2e/MJ by 2040. The lifecycle carbon intensity of fuel pathways would be determined in accordance with the NM GREET model, in line with CA-GREET. The introduction of the New Mexico’s program could mean an extended credit generation lifeline for potential deficit generators under the LCFS in the coming years. However, given the size of New Mexico’s transportation fuel market, significant price incentives would be required to attract fuel producers to the state.

Source: CTFP Discussion Draft Rules, NMED

Source: CTFP Discussion Draft Rules, NMED

Source: CTFP Discussion Draft Rules, NMED
The CTFP considers the transportation fuels either produced in, imported to or dispensed for use in New Mexico to be eligible for regulation under the program to varying degrees.
The regulated fuels in the program would be Gasoline, Diesel, Fossil-based natural gas (compressed, liquefied, and liquefied-compressed), Liquefied petroleum gases, Denatured ethanol, Hydrogen, Biodiesel, Renewable diesel, Renewable naphtha, Renewable gasoline. The opt-in fuels would be Electricity, Bio-based natural gas (compressed, liquefied, and liquefied-compressed), Renewable propane or other liquefied gases not included under bio-based natural gas, Alternative jet fuel, Other bio-based or renewable transportation fuels not included in regulated fuels.
Rail locomotives, jet fuel and military tactical vehicles would be exempt from generating deficits under the Program. The Program would follow a quarterly reporting schedule as in the California LCFS Program.
The rules do not provide for project-based crediting which has been a unique and arguably controversial provision under California’s program which allowed for generating compliance credits by implementing renewable energy or energy efficiency projects in upstream petroleum production. However, the rules do allow for CCS (Carbon Capture and Sequestration) components in fuel pathway applications.
The draft rules do not allude to an automatic acceleration mechanism or feedstock restriction on biofuels as in California’s LCFS. Considering the smaller scale of the New Mexican market and nascent stage of rulemaking, the absence of these components does not go against expectations.
The CTFP would levy an annual program implementation fee of $5000 for deficit generators, $1000 for credit generators and $500 for all registered parties.
The eligibility for registration and subsequent credit generation under the fuel supply equipment credits provision would be based on the weighted average CI of the dispensed fuel in comparison to the Diesel CI standard (for Medium-Heavy Duty Vehicle FSE) and Gasoline (for Light-Medium Duty Vehicle FSE).
New Mexico takes the lead in expanding clean fuels programs beyond the West Coast
Clean Transportation Fuel Program Discussion Draft Rules
cCarbon will closely monitor the rulemaking process and market developments surrounding New Mexico’s CTFP in the coming weeks and months. Stay tuned to get deeper insights and analysis on North American and global clean fuel markets. Check out our Analyst Note for analysis and forecasts on the implications of the latest amendments to the California LCFS Program.
[1] Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data Explorer, US EPA
[2] Motor gasoline consumption, price, and expenditure estimates, 2022
Our market portals and InSights are only for logged-in users with the relevant access. This can be you too…
Your Current Membership Does not Include this Content
This content is outside of your current package. If you need this too, let’s talk…
Send this problem to our Clients team, and we will get back to you shortly with a plan of attack.
Speak and exchange notes with our specific-market expert, use your complimentary hours.
Arrange with Client TeamTell us who you are, and what you're after. We'll find you the right person with the answer - before you wake up twice.
Tell us who you are, and what you're after. We'll find you the right person with the answer - before you wake up twice.
Your name and email in exchange for staying up to date across the world's environmental markets... what a deal?!
Your Current Membership Does not Include this Content
This content is outside of your current package.
If you need this too, let's talk…
Phasellus tempor tincidunt sem, sed dictum ipsum mollis vitae. Maecenas eu diam convallis, pellentesque lacus et, mollis enim.
| ID # | Custom Name | Created On | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Phasellus tempor tincidunt sem, sed dictum ipsum mollis vitae. Maecenas eu diam convallis, pellentesque lacus et, mollis enim.
| # ID | Custom Name | Created On | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|